Despite the current economic environment, many companies still have healthy balance sheets and cash reserves to manage.  Corporate investment policies are something that come up from time to time among Board members, owners, firm partners, and financial departments of a wide range of companies.  But who’s really thinking about them?

It appears that not many professionals are.  At an event held by the Financial Management Association of NH on Monday, November 10th, less than a handful of financial professionals - out of a crowd of 100+ attendees - acknowledged implementing or being aware of any such policy within their organizations.  That so few of us were up to speed on the topic was a shocking realization to me.   Certainly the executives on hand are responsible leaders at the helms of successful organizations, therefore it stands to reason that such a fundamental step is more commonly deprioritized than it is taken to heart.  Here’s a primer on investment policies, courtesy of Morningstar.

Paul Miller of Axial Financial Group, who served on Monday’s panel along with Al Romero, SVP Business Banking at Bank of America and Matt Finn, VP Finance & Operations at Bradford Networks, highlighted two case studies that underscore the importance of using an investment policy.  One of the case studies  focused on a publicly-traded company that developed an investment policy stating that the “primary objective is preservation of capital and liquidity.”  This policy, which had been vetted by the management team and Board, was credited by that company’s CFO with helping them through the volatility of the past year and keeping them out of investment options such as auction rate securities.  Because of their policy, the company knew to immediately forego any goals of high yield in favor of keeping their cash in the safest vehicles available, and as a result were able to maintain the liquidity they needed.

An investment policy need not be overly complex, but I believe it is a fundamental building block for growing organizations, whether public or private.  And if the current economic climate does not convince us of that, perhaps nothing will!

The volatility on Wall Street last week was another in a long line of events that is making for an historically unstable economic environment. However, in our line of work we see a lot of the activity on the front lines, and we want to emphasize that there is still business to win and still growth to attain. Despite a climate that is financially questionable relative to recent years, the capitalist nature of the country offers opportunities for businesses to thrive – even in anxious times.

Our latest audiocast is on this very subject, and I encourage you to give a listen below or download the mp3. Feel free to drop us a comment or an email if you have any questions…as always, we’re happy to engage in a discussion about what’s happening across the business landscape.

New guidelines on fraud prevention tactics were issued this summer in a joint effort by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, the AICPA, and the Institute of Internal Auditors. You can check out a summary press release here; the general theme they convey is that companies need to do more to prevent fraud along a number of fronts:

Five key principles within the guidance address governance, risk assessment, fraud prevention and detection, investigation, and corrective action. Following the guidance will help ensure that there is suitable oversight of fraud risk management, that fraud exposures are identified and evaluated, that appropriate processes and procedures are in place to manage those exposures, and that fraud allegations are addressed in a timely manner.

The risk of fraud is substantial and the median loss amounts have been increasing steadily over the years. For that reason I certainly share the desire to alert company leaders to the risk, especially in the current economic climate. The pressures of fraud are increasing on individuals as consumerism meets a downturning economic environment. The credit crunch, falling housing prices and the pressures of a consumption lifestyle will turn the unlikeliest individuals to acts of misappropriation (more on that in this MFA audiocast).

Though trust and delegation of authority are integral parts of enabling an organization’s members to achieve truly remarkable levels of performance, the lack of oversight can also open up gaps that enable fraud. They can be closed, however, through sound management principles that create oversight mechanisms that will monitor activity, promote transparency, and ensure that the collective assets of the organization are protected from malfeasance.

Despite suffering loss, organizations still have the onus of proving it and recovering lost property, often without the active involvement of law enforcement. Public agencies have limited resources and are often diverted by other causes — and no preventive regulations will ever match the safeguards provided by sound management and a well laid out process.

Local PD’s don’t have the resources to conduct forensic audits, and state and federal agencies only commit to glamour cases. These glamour cases are often restricted to publicly traded companies, identity theft, defrauding investors and other public related matters…there are many gems in this area, but a regional standout was the TJX case that surfaced last year. Internal breaches of fiduciary responsibility, especially when they involve businesses, are often low on the law enforcement totem pole.

The most important starting point in fraud prevention is realizing that the responsibility rests squarely on management’s shoulders to minimize opportunities for a potential fraudster. These newly issued guidelines cite practical approaches to prompt responsible managers to institute appropriate control mechanisms into their organizations. Applying such principles of effective oversight can promote efficiency, create transparency and effectively mitigate an organization’s risks of fraud.