MFA Interior Header - Alerts and Insights

Revenue Recognition’s Real Life Impact

by Michelle Kupka October 14, 2009

| More |

We recently issued an alert about FASB’s new rules regarding “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and “Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Certain Arrangements That Contain Software Elements.” FASB ratified the standards in late September, and they will cause some shifts in accounting for technology companies.

Before the change, companies that made smart-phones, telecommunications equipment, semiconductor equipment and other related products were required to bundle the hardware in their products with vital software components, and then use software rules to recognize the revenue.  From a business perspective, this raises the potential for a reduction in reported revenue. Companies like Apple, for example, suffered when sales and profits from their iPhone appeared lower (17% and 58% lower respectively) under the traditional system.  CFO Magazine covered this nicely in their September piece, “New Revenue-Recognition Rules: The Apple of Apple’s Eye.”

The new rules allow companies to recognize more of the revenue from a hybrid-type product than before. Unbundling software from hardware allows the hardware sales to be recognized sooner, as software’s revenue is added up more slowly; over the life of the contract or according to the software’s expected life cycle. This is designed to give a more accurate picture of revenue, which can have a tremendous impact on corporate earnings and shareholder value.

The new rules also put the U.S. on par with the rest of the world, which has already adopted the practices. Companies will be required to comply by June 15, 2010 but are allowed to adopt the practice as early as this quarter.

Sounds good right? The change could create a bump in sales and profits in the short-term for the companies affected. However, as described in our September 8th post, the benefits come with a cost: “The new guidance will require enhanced financial statement disclosure – the new EITF proposal includes a four page example of such a disclosure (no, I am not kidding). These additional disclosure requirements will entail both qualitative and quantitative information surrounding the significant judgments involved with multiple deliverable revenue recognition.”

Thus, while the new rules will likely have a positive impact on financial statements, there may be significant leg-work involved in order to get there.

This entry was filed under Revenue recognition , Technology . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site.

Material Discussed in this MFA Business Insights Blog is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without obtaining professional advice tailored to your firm's individual and specific needs. This information is for general guidance only and is not a substitute for professional advice.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.


0 comment(s)

Add your comment

Comments
Fields marked with an asterisk are required *
Name *
E-mail *
Comments *
Verification Code
Please type the string shown above *
Related Team Member(s)
230x230michelle_kupka80x80
Michelle E. Kupka
Partner
(978) 557-5342
Email Me
Tags
XBRL GAAP Nonprofit Audit Audit Commitee GAAS Service Organization Control Report SOC SOC 1 SOC 2 SSAE 16 R&D Tax Credit investment investment environment Form 990 990-EZ 990-T Tax-Exempt Information Tax Roth IRA 401(k) Internal Controls widgets Nexus State Sales Tax Multi-state sales tax Goodwill Impairment SAS70 reporting ERISA Davis-Bacon Act Department of Labor SALT single sales factor SAS 70 SOC Reports IRS Real Estate eCommerce Sales Tax Dodd-Frank Act SEC Financial Reporting 1099 Health Care Reform Act Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Small Business Jobs and Credit Act Exit Planning Due Diligence Pension Protection Act of 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ESPP Form 3921 Form 3922 ISOs Section 6039 409A business advisory business faqs fair market value newly formed entities Employee Retirement Income Security Act Fiduciary Responsibilities ISAE 3402 AICPA Blue-Ribbon Panel FAF NASBA Bush-era tax cuts capital gains tax child tax credit gift tax tax rate FASB IASB Topic 840 Mary Shapiro proxy voting system public company Healthcare Reform Act HIRE Act IFRS private companies public companies clawback provisions revenue recognition FAS 157 Topic 820 M&A acquisitions Tax Credits Payroll Tax Estate Tax SOX 404(a) 404(b) internal controls CFOs economy Health Care Tax Credit audit fair share contribution Massachusetts Health Care Reform Estate Planning Loss Carrybacks arbitrage strategy FIN 48 uncertain tax positions nonprofit Haiti Relief Donations Qualified Disaster Relief fraud prevention Massachusetts Privacy Law 201 CMR WISP fair value valuation FAS 141R leases accounting standards ASC 840 manufacturing life sciences biotech Multinational Tax technology finance wealth management Fair Value reporting standards codification NOLs credit credit risk banks lenders due diligence loans nonprofits Tax Incentive Life Sciences American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act Economic Stimulus stock options Reporting Standards Valuation Economy Public Companies Fraud Prevention IPO Transfer Pricing Vaulation 141R Revenue Recognition eCommerce Sales Tax Stock Options